Tokyo: 
8:19 am
Singapore: 
7:19 am
News
Oct 06, 2011

Japan and Seven Other Countries Sign ACTA

Signing Ceremony Held in Tokyo

Japan and seven other countries signed the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) in Tokyo on October 1. ACTA is an international agreement that is intended to combat the counterfeiting and pirating of goods through international cooperation and enforcement. The other signatories of ACTA are America, Australia, Canada, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, and South Korea.

ACTA entitles right holders to civil judicial procedures to enforce IP rights, with the availability of damages and injunctive relief. ACTA also provides for border measures related to imports, exports, and in-transit goods, which allow the right holder to request customs authorities to suspend the release of goods. Customs authorities will have the authority to act upon their own initiative regarding the suspension of the release of goods, and may order the destruction of goods upon a finding of infringement. ACTA also calls for criminal procedures and penalties for certain cases.

ACTA remains open for signing by other WTO members until May 2013. It will not go into force until ratified by six signatories.

ACTA has been controversial because of privacy and freedom of expression concerns, and because the negotiations leading up to the signing have been secret. Some have speculated that ratification by six signatories will not be easy.

In Japan, protection is quite strong for right holders. Article 4, Clause 1 of Japan’s Internet Service Provider Responsibility Restraint Law (known as the purobaida sekinin seigen-ho in Japanese) requires internet service providers to disclose the names and addresses of internet users who infringe the rights of others. The Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry provides details here of the remedies available to right holders whose IP rights have been infringed, including civil court procedures, requesting criminal prosecution, and requesting a suspension at customs. In addition, the Japan Customs Law prohibits the importation of goods that infringe upon intellectual property rights. The punishment for violating the applicable provisions of the Customs Law is imprisonment of up to 10 years and/or a fine of up to 10 million yen, plus confiscation and destruction of the goods.


Click here to learn about nipponCompass’s services for tracking copyright infringement over the internet.

News browser
page 1/3
News
JPO Begins Anti-Counterfeiting Campaign
05
Dec
Surprising Trademark Registrations
25
Nov
OTOKO NO KO
A Few Notable Appeal Decisions by the JPO
22
Nov
November 2011
Newsletter, November 2011
10
Nov
2011 Patent Information Fair & Conference
Trademark Similarity Analysis: "PAG"
01
Nov
Case Number: H23 Gyo-ke 10093, Date of Judgment: October 24, 2011, Court: Intellectual Property High Court, Third Division
Trademark Similarity Analysis: "Universal"
31
Oct
Case Number: H23 Gyo-ke 10131, Date of Judgment: October 24, 2011, Court: Intellectual Property High Court, Third Division
Trademark Similarity Analysis: "TANTO"
31
Oct
Case Number: H23 Gyo-ke 10174, Date of Judgment: October 11, 2011, Court: Intellectual Property High Court, Second Division
Japan and Seven Other Countries Sign ACTA
06
Oct
Signing Ceremony Held in Tokyo
Newsletter, September 2011
16
Sep
New .XXX Domain Poses Problems for Brand Owners
Trademark Similarity Analysis: "I-TEC"
12
Sep
Case Number: H23 Gyo-ke 10004, Date of Judgment: June 28, 2011, Court: Intellectual Property High Court, Second Division
Confiscation of Knockoffs from January to June 2011
05
Sep
Date of Announcement: September 2, 2011
JPO Further Extends Deadline for Earthquake Victims to March 31, 2012
04
Sep
Date of Announcement: August 23, 2011
Registration of a Three-Dimensional Trademark for the Y Chair
01
Sep
Case Number : H22 Gyo-ke 10253, Date of Judgment: June 29, 2011, Court: Intellectual Property High Court, Third Division
Launch of PPH MOTTAINAI Pilot Program
26
Aug
JPO Accelerates Patent Applications by Simplifying Filing Requirements
Members of RIAJ Sue Japanese ISPs for Disclosure of Users’ Identities
26
Aug
IP Rights vs. Privacy Rights