Tokyo: 
8:19 am
Singapore: 
7:19 am
News
Oct 31, 2011

Trademark Similarity Analysis: "Universal"

Case Number: H23 Gyo-ke 10131, Date of Judgment: October 24, 2011, Court: Intellectual Property High Court, Third Division

The Applicant filed an application with the Japan Patent Office (JPO) to register the trademark ユニヴァーサル法律事務所(“univasaru houritsu jimusho”, which means “Universal Law Office” in English, application number 2008-47888), in class 45. The JPO trademark examiner rejected the application on the grounds that the mark is similar to mark no. 3122326, “Universal” (with device), which is registered in class 42, but covers similar goods. The applicant filed an appeal to the IP High Court.

The IP High Court reversed the JPO’s decision, finding that the marks are not similar. The court reasoned that the Applicant’s mark is written in standard characters, with the same font size and same amount of spacing between characters, and no space between the katakana and kanji parts of the mark. This indicates that the mark should be read as one mark, rather than divisible into its components. The court also stated that because lawyers must use the words “houritsu jimusho” (“law office”) when naming their law office, it means that the Applicant is not using only the word “univasaru” (“universal”), but is using both “univasaru” and “houritsu jimusho” at the same time. As a result, the Applicant’s mark and the cited mark sound different.

The court also reasoned that the appearances of the two marks are different, and both marks have different meanings: the Applicant’s mark means a law office that is universal, whereas the cited mark means “universal” only.

Because the sounds, appearances, and meanings of the two marks are different, the court reversed the JPO’s decision, based on Article 4(1)(xi) of the Trademark Act. That provision states that no trademark will be registered if the trademark “is identical with, or similar to, another person’s registered trademark which has been filed prior to the filing date of an application for registration of the said trademark, if such a trademark is used in connection with the designated goods or designated services relating to the said registered trademark” (Article 4(1)(xi)).

Click here to see images of the two marks.


Are you interested in registering a trademark in Japan? Click here to learn about nipponCompass’s trademark services.

News browser
page 1/3
News
JPO Begins Anti-Counterfeiting Campaign
05
Dec
Surprising Trademark Registrations
25
Nov
OTOKO NO KO
A Few Notable Appeal Decisions by the JPO
22
Nov
November 2011
Newsletter, November 2011
10
Nov
2011 Patent Information Fair & Conference
Trademark Similarity Analysis: "PAG"
01
Nov
Case Number: H23 Gyo-ke 10093, Date of Judgment: October 24, 2011, Court: Intellectual Property High Court, Third Division
Trademark Similarity Analysis: "Universal"
31
Oct
Case Number: H23 Gyo-ke 10131, Date of Judgment: October 24, 2011, Court: Intellectual Property High Court, Third Division
Trademark Similarity Analysis: "TANTO"
31
Oct
Case Number: H23 Gyo-ke 10174, Date of Judgment: October 11, 2011, Court: Intellectual Property High Court, Second Division
Japan and Seven Other Countries Sign ACTA
06
Oct
Signing Ceremony Held in Tokyo
Newsletter, September 2011
16
Sep
New .XXX Domain Poses Problems for Brand Owners
Trademark Similarity Analysis: "I-TEC"
12
Sep
Case Number: H23 Gyo-ke 10004, Date of Judgment: June 28, 2011, Court: Intellectual Property High Court, Second Division
Confiscation of Knockoffs from January to June 2011
05
Sep
Date of Announcement: September 2, 2011
JPO Further Extends Deadline for Earthquake Victims to March 31, 2012
04
Sep
Date of Announcement: August 23, 2011
Registration of a Three-Dimensional Trademark for the Y Chair
01
Sep
Case Number : H22 Gyo-ke 10253, Date of Judgment: June 29, 2011, Court: Intellectual Property High Court, Third Division
Launch of PPH MOTTAINAI Pilot Program
26
Aug
JPO Accelerates Patent Applications by Simplifying Filing Requirements
Members of RIAJ Sue Japanese ISPs for Disclosure of Users’ Identities
26
Aug
IP Rights vs. Privacy Rights